Thursday, October 22, 2009

Patenting Landscape in India 2009

My latest whitepaper about the status of Patenting Landscape in India is getting coverage in leading IP blogs and news media. I have listed the links below for quick reference:

  1. Patent Baristas: Patenting Landscape in India
  2. IPFrontline : Patenting Landscape in India 2009
  3. ScienceBusiness: India's Patent Progress
More to come.

Friday, June 19, 2009

Evalueserve's India and China IP Whitepaper quoted in Business Standard

IITs to market patents with help from investment firms
Kalpana Pathak & Shivani Shinde / Mumbai June 8, 2009, 0:07 IST
http://www.business-standard.com/india/news/iits-to-market-patentshelpinvestment-firms/360369/

Sitting on a pool of close to 900 patents, the Indian Institutes of Technology (IITs) are, for the first time, planning to monetise these intellectual properties (IPs) by exploring tie-ups with firms that invest in "inventions".

IIT Bombay, for instance, recently joined hands with Intellectual Ventures (which has drawn criticism for being a "patent troll" — those who acquire patents not to develop products but to pressure companies to pay licensing fees) to seek support in marketing and licensing patents the institute holds. IIT Delhi too has signed up with the venture fund and others like IIT Kharagpur, IIT Kanpur and IIT Guwahati are considering such offers.

Other than the US-based Intellectual Ventures, Imperial Innovation — an arm of UK's Imperial College — has approached a few IITs for the same purpose.

PATENT OPPORTUNITIES
Institutes No. of patents
IIT-D 240
IIT-B 200
IIT-K 100
IIT-M 125
IIT-KGP 200
IIT-R 12
Source: Industry estimates

“Most of our faculty does research and there’s no inclination towards inventions. With this tie-up there’s a clear incentive to invent,” said Devang Khakkar, director, IIT Bombay. IIT Delhi Director Surendra Prasad agrees: “Securing the intellectual property (IP) has never been a major ambition for a faculty member. Since this tie-up, we have a regular series of patent filing which is picking up now. Besides, arrangements like these would help us protect the IP to an extent.” On an average, IIT Delhi files 20-25 patents annually.

Most of the IITs agree that while faculty members are interested in research, few actually take this as an opportunity for innovation. They are discovering that tying with companies like Intellectual Ventures helps because it provides them the wherewithal to market and monetise their patents.

Moreover, IITs say these companies not only facilitate the institute in filing for patents, but also to invent in the knowledge gap areas, called open invention.

Filing a patent in India, for instance, costs between Rs 4,000 and Rs 5,000, compared to around $25,000 to $30,000 (Rs 12 lakh to Rs 14 lakh) in the US. Indian universities still lack the capability to raise funds for innovation. A majority of large universities globally have a Technology Licensing Officer who works towards raising commercial investment in the development of innovation.

Industry observers agree that patent disclosures have increased dramatically since the IITs started tying up with these companies. “In a year’s time, patent disclosures have more than doubled. And in the next few years, it would go three-four times higher,” said a senior executive from one of the invested companies. Agrees IIT-B, which has seen the number of patent disclosures double.

The number of patents filed for 2007-08 is still not available. The Office of the Controller General of Patents, Designs & Trade Marks said the number of patents filed in 2006-07 was 28,940 — a 19 per cent increase over 24,505 filed in 2005-06. The number of applications for patents originating from India was 5,314 — approximately 18 per cent of the total number of applications.

India, though, is a laggard when compared to China which is the third-most prolific patent-filing country in the world after the United States and Japan. The State Intellectual Property Office of China (SIPO) received more than 694,000 patent applications in 2007, says an Evalueserve report.

The Indian Patent Office, on the other hand, received just 35,000, 20-year patent applications in 2007-08. “Patent filing has been growing in both China and India at about 20 per cent a year, compared with a 7 per cent growth rate for the US. However, SIPO received approximately the same number of 20-year applications in 1997 as the IPO did in 2007-08. This implies that India is approximately 10 years behind China,” the report added.

If patent filings in China continue to grow at the present rate, SIPO will overtake the US Patents Office by 2012 in innovation patents.

There are several reasons for the rapid proliferation of patenting in China, especially after that country joined the World Trade Organisation in 2001. In China, patents are issued faster than in India: the average time taken from filing to grant in 2007 was 26 months for invention patents, 6.8 months for utility model patents and 6.6 months for design patents. In India it takes three to five years for a patent to be granted.

The Chinese government also gives grants to research institutes and universities filing a large number of patent applications. The patent office also has many initiatives to create intellectual property awareness among Chinese companies.

Saturday, May 02, 2009

Summary of presentations and whitepapers authored by me I have created a short profile providing my key achievements in authoring whitepapers and delivering IP presentations.

You can view my profile and download PDF copies of all my presentations and whitepapers till date by visiting http://balwantonline.googlepages.com/
IPR Tools for effective growth of SMEs

On the occasion of World IP Day, FICCI and Department of Commerce and Industrial Promotion, Government of India, organized an IP seminar on April 27, 2009 for Small and Medium Scale Industries (SMEs). I participated in the seminar and presented a session on the topic - "IPR Tools for effective growth of SMEs". The Programme aimed to showcase how SMEs have created and protected their IP for sustained business growth and to provide an opportunity to the SMEs to have an insight so as to empower them with in-depth knowledge.

It was a nice experience presenting in such a good forum. The presentation can be found at FICCI's website. It is my second presentation at the FICCI forum. Last time I presented a session in October 2008 on the topic "Software patents".

I have attached the photographs from the recent event.


Saturday, March 14, 2009

Patents may stall Nano's int'l sales
The Times of India- 16 February 2009



My Tata Nano whitepaper listed on SSRN's Top Ten download list


-----Original Message-----
From: management@ssrn.com [mailto:management@ssrn.com]
Sent: Mon 09-Feb-09 2:53 PM
To: bsrawat@gmail.com
Subject: Your Paper Makes SSRN Top Ten List
Dear Balwant Rawat:

Your paper entitled, "Patent or Perish: Why Your Innovation Can Be Your Competitor's Free Lunch" was recently listed on SSRN's Top Ten download list for Chicago Booth School of Business Economics Research Papers, LSICL: International Intellectual Property Protection (Topic), Max Planck Institute for Intellectual Property, Competition & Tax Law Research Paper Series and Max Planck: Intellectual Property & Competition Law (Topic). To view the top ten list for the journal click on its name Chicago Booth School of Business Economics Research Papers Top Ten, LSICL: International Intellectual Property Protection (Topic) Top Ten, Max Planck Institute for Intellectual Property, Competition & Tax Law Research Paper Series Top Ten and Max Planck: Intellectual Property & Competition Law (Topic) Top Ten and to view all the papers in the journals click on these links link(s) Chicago Booth School of Business Economics Research Papers All Papers, LSICL: International Intellectual Property Protection (Topic) All Papers, Max Planck Institute for Intellectual Property, Competition & Tax Law Research Paper Series All Papers and Max Planck: Intellectual Property & Competition Law (Topic) All Papers.

As of 02/09/2009 your paper has been downloaded 20 times. You may view the abstract and download statistics at the URL: http://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=1331899.

Your paper may be listed in the Top Ten for other networks or journals and if so, you will receive additional notices at that time. If your paper was classified for additional SSRN journals, you may receive this announcement prior to distribution of your abstract in those additional journals.

To view the any of the Top Ten lists, click the TOP button on: http://www.ssrn.com/Browse

To view your SSRN Author Page: http://ssrn.com/author=1052624.

If you have any corrections or additions please use the email form available on your author page to send them to us.

You can use these URLs to refer readers directly to your paper and SSRN Author Page. Many authors include links to their SSRN papers and their SSRN Author Page on their own home pages, and in the signature on their emails. Here is an example of an email signature reference to your author page:

My papers are available on SSRN at: http://ssrn.com/author=1052624

To view the Top Authors Lists:
http://ssrn.com/TopAuthors

Thank you for your participation in the Social Science Research Network. We welcome any comments or suggestions and hope you will submit additional papers to the SSRN eLibrary.

Sincerely, Michael C. Jensen
Chairman
Social Science Research Network
Patent or Perish: "Why your innovation can be your competitor’s free lunch”
Author: Navtej Saluja and Balwant Rawat

Global research and analytics firm, Evalueserve, drew an interesting comparison between Tata’s much awaited Nano and the colorful Crocs footwear. The funny-looking Crocs footwear that initially elicited stares and snickers had suddenly become serious business after its launch. However, since the beginning of 2008, the share price of Crocs has fallen by 97%. One of the main reasons behind the mighty fall of Crocs is the wide availability of cheap knockoffs, which Crocs would like to eliminate from its primary markets, but it does not have the adequate patent protection to do so. In a similar vein, the unveiling of Nano, at a price of about USD 2,500 by Tata Motors in January 2008 has catapulted the image of the company, and renewed people’s interest in cheap and fuel efficient cars. Unlike the Crocs-inspired Chery S16 compact car, the Tata Nano is a smart-looking car, but is it innovative? Is this innovation sufficiently protected by patents? How can the carmaker avoid the mistakes and pitfalls that have plagued Crocs Inc.? These are some of the questions that Evalueserve has addressed in its recently released article titled, ‘Patent or Perish - Why your innovation can be your competitor’s free lunch?

Click here to get full text of the whitepaper

The full text is also available at http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1331899

View Balwant's other whitepapers at http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/cf_dev/AbsByAuth.cfm?per_id=1052624